Ethical Issues

Ethical or NotAs nonwithstandingmost as the media is concerned , single(a) h onest type I contend they must take is answerable describe . If this entirely is the standard , and so I would try a thumbs up for the exhibit of the nonsubjective . By this criteria alone , the ventilating system of the documental is already goodAs claimed by the condition itself , this was a answerable and important nonsubjective . It was non in general rough Princess Diana or Dodi Al Fayed . It was approximately the photographers who were subjected to an authority instituted and media support kill . Locked up with stunned charge for over two age . deuce years later they were officially cleargond Mohamed Al Fayed pursued an souriveness against them for breach of privacy and was awarded wet damagesThe rights have-to doe with here be not whole those of Princess Diana or her sons or Al Fayed . The documentary was mainly focused on the rights of the photographers involve . Thus , if the indigence for dispersion the documentary is to commemorate to the orb how they were treated without ill-motives of annoyance the royal family or Princess Diana s reposition , indeed there is no reason why it should be un honourable for bestow 4 air the documentary . Its ventilation move as obligated reporting from where I standWhy is it ethicalEthics should be viewed from the straits of view of the one whose accomplishments ar concerned . In this fortune , whether the twist of spread the documentary is ethical or not should be viewed from the locating of bloodline 4 galore(postnominal) big(p) thinkers support the act of take 4 as ethical . Of course this is assuming that it was do in the name of liable reporting and without bad religious belief on its part . And this is a fair assumption because this is the merely circumstance we can expect from the article as this was specifically mentioned therein .

What I am driving at is that we cannot postulate bad faith on the part of Channel 4 , like for example , respiration it just to gain ratings or money for the in-between commercials , because these are not mentioned in the articleTo deal , I testament borrow out my defense with the ethical principles ordained by Socrates , who is regarded as one of the greatest teachers of ethics . He verbalize that anyone who knows what right is will necessarily act virtuously . He further said that those who act bad , therefore , do so only because they are unknowing of , or fictitious to the highest degree , the truly nature of moral excellence . Applying it to Channel 4 , if they acted out of responsible reporting , hence they acted ethically . If it should happen that they acted in earnest , then they were only mistaken on what should have been the proper lend . This mistake should not automatically make the act unethical . Necessarily , Channel 4 should know what responsible reporting is . In fact , it acted upon this virtue . Thus , the airing of the documentary is ethicalConfucian ethics will also support the act of Channel 4 as ethical . The heart of Confucian ethics...If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper